Text
June 03, 2012
0 comments
8 notes

VICTORY: APPELLATE COURT UPHOLDS THE RIGHT OF INCARCERATED TRANSGENDER PEOPLE TO HAVE NAME CHANGED

thespiritwas:

May 31, 2012

Contact Information: 

Contact: Chase Strangio

(212) 337-8550 Ext. 302

chase@srlp.org

After a two year legal struggle, New York courts uphold an incarcerated transgender woman’s right to change her name, reversing an earlier denial of her legal name change related to lack of medical evidence and the possibility of “confusion”

 

ALBANY - The New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department, held that an incarcerated transgender petitioner cannot be denied a name change simply because she seeks to adopt a feminine name in place of a traditionally masculine name.

SRLP initially filed a name change petition on behalf of Shaniece N. Powell, a writer who runs the blog Indelicate Prose (indelicateprose.wordpress.com), in the Supreme Court of Chemung County in July 2011 following a lengthy legal struggle to obtain her birth certificate, which are often inaccessible to incarcerated people.  Justice Judith O’Shea of the Supreme Court initially denied Ms. Powell’s petition because it did not include affidavits from physicians or therapists that she had completed sex reassignment surgery.  Justice O’Shea ruled that “the name change will cause confusion…and is fraught with the danger or deception.”

Upon reviewing the Supreme Court’s decision, the Appellate Division, Third Department ordered that Ms Powell’s petition be granted.  Writing on behalf of a unanimous panel of five judges, Justice Mercure stated that the petitioner had the right to change her name and that “confusion is attendant to any change of name and does not, in itself, justify denial.” In support of the decision, Justice Mercure cited two of SRLP’s earlier victories: Matter of Golden, the first appellate level case holding that failure to provide medical evidence is not grounds to deny a name change petition filed by a transgender petitioner and Matter of Guido, which held that judges cannot impose extra requirements under the name change statute simply because the petitioner is seeking a name change to one traditionally associated with the opposite gender.

In overturning the Supreme Court decision, the Third Department also rejected Justice O’Shea’s suggestion that the submission of medical or psychological affidavits were necessary to supplement Ms Powell’s petition.

Chase Strangio, the Sylvia Rivera Law Project attorney & Equal Justice Fellow who represented Ms. Powell named the decision as a victory, “We applaud the Court’s reversal of the lower court’s denial of Ms. Powell’s name change. The decision below ignored the law and clearly reflects the biases that transgender individuals are perpetually forced to navigate in the legal system. Legal name changes are vital for transgender individuals who need identification that affirms their preferred name. In New York, and in most jurisdictions in the United States, a name change order is required before legal identification documents can be updated. SRLP has fought judicial bias in the name change process since we opened in 2003.”

Sylvia Rivera Law Project attorney Elana Redfield discussed the broader implications of today’s ruling, “Prior to today’s decision, name changes in the Third Department (which covers vast territory in Eastern New York State, excluding New York City) might include a statement that the name change order does not prove that a gender change has taken place - which led to a lot of confusion and was wasn’t actually within the court’s power to determine. The court’s decision today improves on the previous case law by not making any determination or statements regarding the petitioner’s gender - leaving it open to the individual to self-determine their gender or gender transition without the court overreaching their jurisdiction to weigh in on it.”

After the initial ruling in the lower court that denied the name change, Ms Powell reflected that she would continue the fight to get her name changed, “well…the new news was of course disheartening, but I hope that we can strike again and get a new outcome. I am really not shocked. My type aren’t really accepted with kisses to the cheek and warm embraces. I will not give up hope and I am remaining positive and optimistic.”

By reversing the lower court’s order in this case, the Appellate Department helps to ensure that transgender individuals in prison will have access to the courts to assume names consistent with their gender identities and that the law that applies equally to incarcerated and non-incarcerated transgender petitioners. For Ms. Powell, this decision means that she will be referred to by her preferred name by officers, prison officials and other individuals.

Even with a victory such as this ruling, the work isn’t over yet, Strangio explained, “the struggle for full justice for our transgender, gender non-conforming and intersex community members in prison continues but we honor this decision, as well as Ms. Powell’s bravery and resistance, as powerful acts to bring affirmation and recognition to those who are fighting to survive in New York prisons and jails.”

Full decision available here.

Quote
June 03, 2012
0 comments
"the Women in Print Movement was not unique—all political liberation movements must bring forward suppressed ideas and often develop cultural, literary, and journalistic organizations. The Women in Print Movement was necessary because, not surprisingly, national mainstream publishing corporations were not interested in encouraging independent women’s liberation or lesbian grass-roots organizing through germination and distribution of our work."

—

Minnie Bruce Pratt, in The Struggle to Write

(via persistanceanthology) 

Quote
June 03, 2012
0 comments
7 notes
"

Art has no function. It is not necessary. It has nothing to do with what anyone wants you to do or wants it to be, nothing but you and itself. The work generates itself and ideas and progress and learning come out of doing the work in a particular way. Creative art is a learning process for the artist and not a description of what is already known.

An audience is always warming but it must never be necessary to your work. The work needs concentration and one is often exhausted by it. It takes so much effort just to begin and although going on is mostly a pleasure it is also a great effort. The only thing for a creative artist to do is to do his chosen work.

But really there is no choice. Nobody chooses. The only thing left for a creative artist to do is to do his chosen work in spite of everything and regardless of anything because when living draws to its end there are no excuses he can make to himself or to anyone else for not having done it. Either he did do it or he did not do it and very often he did not. Alas very often he did not.

"

—

Gertrude Stein about art, as given to Eileen by Avram Davidson, and cribbed from Scott Edelman

(via msagara)

(via kateelliottsff)

Quote
June 02, 2012
0 comments
"The writer isn’t made in a vacuum. Writers are witnesses. The reason we need writers is because we need witnesses to this terrifying century."

— E.L Doctorow

Video
June 02, 2012
0 comments
1 note

Advice for writers/artists from Neil Gaiman, from his address to University of the Arts Class of 2012

(via @sassafraslowrey)

Quote
June 01, 2012
0 comments
49 notes
"The thing is, once we have reached a certain mastery of craft, craft is no longer the issue. In order to take our writing to the next level we must embrace our strange, unique, and often embarrassing selves and write about the things that really matter to us. We need to be willing to peel our own layers back until we reach that tender, raw, voiceless place—the place where our crunchiest stories come from. We need to get some skin in the game. It should cost us something emotionally to tell our stories. But many of us who come to writing do so because they were voiceless at some point in their lives, so doing that can be the most terrifying risk of all."

— The fabulous Robin LaFevers on second chances in one’s writing career (Writer Unboxed)

(Source: malindalo)

Quote
June 01, 2012
0 comments
"Usually when I have what I call an interrupting idea, or a pushy idea, I know what idea it is, what characters, some clue, but not this time. So when I uncaged my muse I had no idea what we’d be working on. Why did I interrupt the Merry book, because I’ve learned that if an idea is pushy enough it will actually act like a creative log jam. It can bring all work to a grinding halt."

— Laurell K. Hamilton

Quote
May 31, 2012
0 comments
7 notes
"I’m always hesitant about talking about character in the abstract, because I believe character in literature is just developed in the story, and the way we get to know Min is because of what happens to her, what she says and how she describes things. So many people are defined by their interest in some kind of art form or piece of culture, but they aren’t practitioners of that, they aren’t even going to be practitioners of that. That just was interesting to me. It does seem like a big gap between life and life as portrayed in not-very-well-written books for young people is that—you can know plenty of people who are crazy about The Smiths, or never miss a Martin Scorsese movie, but that’s not actually what’s defining about them, and wasn’t even when they were 15."

—

daniel handler (lemony snicket) interviewed by tasha robinson at the onion av club, talking about his new YA book “why we broke up” and a whole lot of other things (inc. a prequel to a series of unfortunate events that’s in the works).  well worth a read even for non-fans, I’d say. 

(also, at some point I am going to have some more to say about personality, i.e. nobody has one.)

(via ourcatastrophe)

Quote
May 31, 2012
0 comments
2 notes
"Stories distribute the suffering so that it can be borne."

— E.L Doctorow

Quote
May 30, 2012
0 comments
2 notes
"I write books for teenagers because I vividly remember what it felt like to be a teen facing everyday and epic dangers. I don’t write to protect them. It’s far too late for that. I write to give them weapons–in the form of words and ideas-that will help them fight their monsters. I write in blood because I remember what it felt like to bleed."

—

Sherman Alexie, in Why the Best Kids Books Are Written in Blood

(via @sassafraslowrey)